If your dogwoods
and peony patches are looking a bit more robust than they did 20
years ago, you may have climate change to thank for much of their
growth.
Using two decades' worth of data on climate and vegetation, a
team of scientists has taken what may be the first planet-wide look
at plant activity during a time when Earth's environment underwent
significant change.
The researchers found that globally, shifts in rainfall patterns,
cloud cover, and warming temperatures triggered a 6 percent increase
in the amount of carbon stored in trees, grass, shrubs, and
flowers.
Many scientists hold that the growth in atmospheric
concentrations of heat-trapping carbon-dioxide - from nearly two
centuries of rapidly growing populations that burned increasing
amounts of fossil fuels - is largely responsible for the earth's
warming climate.
The new research adds to the body of evidence that plants can
store increasing amounts of carbon from the atmosphere, but it
remains unclear how long this trend will continue or whether it will
significantly affect atmospheric CO2 levels.
Kyoto provisions
The 1997 Kyoto Protocols - a first step at trying to reduce
emissions and so moderate the change - permits countries to use the
carbon-absorbing capacity of their forests and farmlands as credits
against their emissions targets. In addition, projects that increase
vegetation also are seen as ways to reach national CO2 emissions
targets. Thus, understanding the flow of carbon from the atmosphere
to plants and back is vital to projecting future trends in
atmospheric CO2 levels.
For 50 years, scientists have been measuring the growth of CO2 in
the atmosphere, according to Ramakrishna Nemani, a professor in the
forestry school at the University of Montana in Missoula, who led
the research team. "But if you look at the record of the past two
decades, the annual growth rate hasn't been going up like it had
before," he says.
Other groups had forecast an increase in plant growth for a time
with climate change, although rates would vary depending on region.
And some smaller-scale studies had indicated that the earth was
greening.
Dr. Nemani's team was interested in seeing how plant activity had
changed - and where - worldwide during a 20-year period that saw two
of the warmest decades ever recorded, several intense El Nino
episodes, one major volcanic eruption, a 9 percent increase in
atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and a 37 percent growth in human
population.
The team measured how much carbon plants store after absorbing
carbon dioxide through photosynthesis and returning some of it
through respiration.
First, the team built maps reflecting changes in temperature,
cloud cover (which affects the amount of sunlight reaching plants),
and available water. Then they overlaid satellite data on net
primary productivity on land and looked for relationships among
these components.
Big change in the Amazon
They were stunned at the growth rates in South America's Amazon
region.
"That was a big surprise," says Ranga Myneni, a botanist at
Boston University and a member of the research team. Amazon rain
forests accounted for nearly half the increase seen globally over
the 20-year period.
The surprise was twofold. The growth rate far exceeded what most
scientists expected. Many models indicated that additional growth in
the tropics would be minimal, given the fairly constant temperatures
from one season to the next. In addition, many researchers had held
that any increased productivity in the tropics would largely be
driven by a rise in atmospheric CO2 rather than changes in climate
itself.
Yet the drop in tropical cloud cover during the period allowed
more sunlight into places like Amazonia, Dr. Myneni says, far
outpacing CO2 as a prod to growth. Likewise in other climate
regions, changing Climate conditions appeared to be the dominant
factor driving plant growth.
The other half of the equation
The good news for plants, which appears in Friday's edition of
the journal Science, comes with caveats, Myneni cautions. Since
humans collectively use about half of plants' net primary
production, he says, the team's estimate of 6 percent growth over 20
years translates into a trivial 3 percent growth in material
available to a growing human population.
Moreover, the 20-year period the team studied could be unusual,
and hence not representative of long-term prospects for vegetation
growth. And if the climate continues to warm, as many expect, plants
will bump up against limits to their ability to make use of the
additional water, warmth, and sunlight, just as they bump into
limits on the amount of CO2 they can use. The study also doesn't
answer questions about how changing climate conditions in these
areas are affecting the amount of CO2 given off from plant
decomposition and soil - amounts that can offset the CO2 that plants
imprison in their roots, stems, and leaves.
"That's the other half of the equation" the study doesn't
address, he cautions.